On Present tou Surgery of Stomach and Duodenum with Special Reference to Therapy in Acute Complications of Ulcerous Diseases

Authors

  • Blagoje Kovačević
  • Miroslav Kretić

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5644/Radovi.14

Abstract

Our brief examination of the aetiology and pathogenesis of ulcerous diseases has resulted in the conclusion that, since a number of relevant points remain obscure- no satisfactory answer has yet been found to the problem. Hence it is that ulcers are still being treated symptomatically — never causally.

As regards the acute ulcerous complications the case is rather different, i.e.  a surgical intervention is indicated here as a matter of vital importance.

In the treatment of ulcer perforations, both covered (perforatio. tecta) and open, our Clinic gives the primary resection the preference over other operative and conservative methods — provided the patient’s general condition allows it. In weighing the pros and cons our first consideration is the cardio- vascular system of the patient; the local condition, duration and age come next in importance.

The urgency of surgical intervention in the "perforatio tecta" is justified by the occurrence of various complications that ariše in the event of delayed intervention; in order to prevent these and aid the recovery, an early operation offers a better chance than does any conservative therapy.

The preference given to the primary resection of the stomach over other operative and conservative methods of treatment is based on the following facts:

(i) The mortality rate is not any higher than in cold ulcer resection;

(ii) The technique of resecting is much simpler than after the sutures have been made or the draining done in consequence of the perforation;

(iii) The primary resection does away with the ulcer which has a tendency to undergo perforation again, and in addition to give rise to haemorrhage ox- malignant tumours consequent on degeneration;

(iiii) The primax-y resection removes not only the ulcer but a whole series of factors that are responsible for the rise and growth of ulcerous disease;

(iiiii) Most patients who have been subjected to opcration for simple sutures show great reluctance to undergo further treatment or operation — unless compelled to do so at the last moment owing to reperforation or bleeding.

However, if the general condition or the age of the patient is such as to preclude the primary resection, then a simple sutural closure of an acute perforation is to be carried out.

In big callose perforated ulcers where for various reasons the resection is impracticable and the right suturing difficult to do or likely to result in the stenosis of duodenal lumen — in such cases the draining is performed in accordance with the Neumann-Haberei procedure.

In exceptionally severe cases whcre a surgical intervention is not to be thought of we have recourse to continucd suction, intra-arterial blood transfusions, cardiacs and antibiotics — as a last resource.

In the case of bleeding ulcers our climcians give the operative treatment the preference over the conservative therapy. The reasons for this are many points the modern pathophysiology has succecded in elucidating and which in latent and recurrent haemorrhages due to hypoxie are responsible for the impairment of myocardium, parenchymatous organs and vital subcortical centres.

With reference to the primary mass haemorrhage it is of the first importance, according to the authors, that the checking of a haemorrhagic collapse (by blood transfusions) and the balancing cf metabolism should be followed up by instant surgical intervention, i.e. the resection performed and the bleed­ ing ulcer removed if the general condition of the patient allows it, otherwise the eroded blood vessel need only be tied down. The surgical intervention is conditional on an adequate supply of conserved blood.

Yet if the patient has been scveral hours or days late in reporting the illness, he should be kept under observation and the operation delayed until he is fit enough to undergo the operative trauma with safety.

Latent and recurrent bleeding calls for immediate surgical intervention; but it will brook no delay, or else the time will have gone when the surgeon’s assistance is most effective.

References

Aschner B.: Zeitschr. f. Konstitutionslehre 1923. B. IX. Zentralorg. f. d. ges. Chir. Bd. 22.

Albert: Ulceres pept:ques perfores, complications secundaires, Zazz. med. lomb. 1927.

Andrejević M.: Ulkusna bolest. Beograd 1952.

Dijagnostika i postupak kod ulkusnih krvavljenja. Med. Glasnik 12, 1951.

Alder: Die Behandlung des blutenden Magengeschwiirs nach Meulengracht. Cit. Markoff.

Bickel: Remarques sur le traitement de l’ulcere gastroduodenal. Schweiz. med. Wschr. 20, 1945.

Burbank and Roe: Resent experiences with acute perforation of peptic ulcer at the Massachussentts General Hospital. Review of 288 cases. New Eng. J. Med. 1952. 247/12.

Berezov: Kirurgija — Broj 4 od 1946.

Besset: Sur la diagnostic des perforations des ulceres de l’estemac et du duodenum. Buli. med. Quebec 1925.

Bachrach W. H., Grossman M. I. und Ivy A. C.: Problems in the Etiology of Peptic Ulcer: The Resistance of the Gastrointestinal Tract to the Digestive Action of Its Ovn Secretions. Gastroenterology (Am.) G, 194G.

Esteh O.: Die Geschwiirskrankheit des Magens. Wien 1949.

Babkin B. P.; Secretory mechanism of the digestive glarrds. New,York, P. B. Hoeber, Ine., 1944.

Boller R.: Der operierte Magen. Wien, 1947.

Carkov Ag. M.: Stomačna i duodenalna hirurgia. — Sofia, 1947.

Carayannopoulos (Atena): Gastric rosection as the treatment of perforated gastroduodenal ulcer. Surgery 1952.

Cannon: The motor activ. of the stomach and small intest after splaneh. and vag. sect. Am. journ. of phys. 1906, Bd. 15.

Chiari: Wienei- klin. Wschr., 45, 1947.

Cohnheim O.: Die Krankheiten des Verdaungskanals. 1905.

Cohnheim P.: Arch. f. Verd. Kr. 1921, Bd. 27.

Curschmann: Munchn. med. Wschr. 1918, Nr. 13.

Cushing H.: Peptic ulcers and the interbrairr. Surgery, Gynecology and Obstetrics 1932, Vol. LV.

Dragstedt L. R. und Camp E. H.: Follow-up of Gastric Vagotomy Alone in the Treatment of Peptic Ulcer. Gastroenterology (Am.) 11, 1948.

Dragstedt L. R. und Owens F. M. jr.: Supradiaphragmatic Section of the Vagus Nerves in Treatment of Duodenal Ulcer. Proc. Soc. exper. Biol. a. Med. (Am.) 53, 142, 1943.

Dragstedt L. R., Schafer P. W.: Die Unterbrechung der Vagus-Inervation des Magens bei gastroduodenalen Ulcus. Suergery, Mai 1955 zit. n. Med. Nachr. a. d. USA. Folge 5.

Domanig E.: Die ehirurgisehe Therapie der Ulkuskrankheit. Klin. Med. Heft 3, 1946.

Denk W.: Wiener klin. Wschr. 1919.

Eads: Massive gastrointestinal hemorrhage J.A.M.A. 131, 891, 1946, c. Markoff.

Enderlen: Ueber die Deckung von Magendefekten d. transplantiert. Netz. Deutsche Zeitschr. f. Chir. 1900, Bd. 55.

Enderlen: Zur Behandlung des durchgebrochenen Magengeschwiirs und zur Jejunostomie. Deutsche med. Wschr. Nr. 1, 1926.

Fehr A.: Uber die Vagotomie, Helvetica Chirurg. Acta 1947.

Finsterer H.: Die akute Perforation von Magen- und Duodenalgeschwr. Bruns Beitr. zur klin. Chir. 1910, Bd. 68.

Finsterer H.: Zur Klinik und Therapie des Ulcus duod. Wiener Arch. f. inn. Med. 1922, Bd. 5.

Finsterer H.: Der Wert der Friihoperation bei akuten Magenblutungen aus einem chronischen Uklus. Wiener klin. Wschr. Nr. 7, 1947.

Finsterer H.: Ueber neuere Bestrebungen, die Resultate in der Abdominalchirurgie zu verbessem. (Vortrag bei d. 1. Oesterr. Aerztetagung Salzburg 1947).

Finsterer H.: Malignant Degeneration of Gastric Ulcer. Proceedingd of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol. XXXII. 183.

Finsterer H.: Therapeutische Probleme in der Abdominalchirurgie Wiener klin. Wschr. 46, 1948.

Finsterer H.: Wann muss ein blutendes Magengeschwqr operiert werden? Wiener klin. Wschr. 11, 1937.

Guleke: Chirurgie v. Kirschner-Nordmann Bd. VI.

Ginzberg V.: Ulcus perforans. Vojno-Sanit. pregled 3, 1950.

Ginzberg V.: Hirschleifer J., Ritz N., Schwartz R.: Replacement therapy in gastro-intestinal hemorrhage. The Rev. of Gastroenterology, 15, 747, 1948.

Goropevšek M.: Hematemeza i melena kod gastroduodenalnog ulkusa. S. A. 577, 5, 1938.

Gutmann et Demole: Sur l)origine des hematemeses. Soc. Med. Hop. 576, 1932.

Gjanković H.: 30 godina kirurgije želuca. Acta Chirurgica, 5—6, 1952.

Giordanengo (Novara): 100 cases of Perforated Gastroduodenal Ulcer. Boli. soc. piemont Chir. 1952, 22/8—9.

Girardi, Bencini (Milano): Experiments on the conservative treatment of per­forated gastroduodenal ulcer. Atti soc. lombarda Sci. med. biol. 1952.

Haberer H.: Meine Technik der Magenresektion. Mtinchn. med. Wschr. 80, 915, 1933.

Haberer H.: Chirurgische Behandlung des Magen-Duodenalgeschvvures. Mtinchn. med. Wschr. 80, 1577, 1933.

Haffner: Beitrag zur Behandlung der freien Ulkusperforation. Wiener med. Wschr. 34, 1947.

Haudek: Ein Beitrag zur Pathogen. u. Diagnose des Magen- und Zwdlffingerdarmgeschwurs. Mtinchn. med. Wschr. 31, 32, 1918.

Holler: Ist eine org. Vaguserkrankung der Ursprung des Ulkus ventr. chron. bei Menschen? Wiener klin. Wschr. 19, 1921.

Iselin M.: A propos du traitement non operatiore des ulceres gastro duodenaux perfores. Presse Medical 64, 1950.

Judin: Sovjetskaja medicina. 4, 1947.

Jores A.: Die Beziehung der Hypophyse zum Intestinaltrakt und zur Ulkuskrankheit. Klinische Endokrinologie 1942. Wien.

Kalk: Erfahrungen mit der Proteinkbrpertherapie des Magen- und Duodenalgeschwiirs. Klin. Wochenschrift 28, 1923.

Kalk: Magen und Duodenalgeschwiir. N. D. Klinik, 638, 1930.

Konjizny: Die entziindliche Grundlage der typischen Geschwiirsbildung im Magen und Duodenum. Erg. inn. Med. (D.) 37, 184, 1930.

Konjetzny G. E. und Puhl H.: Ueber die Bedeutung der Gastritis und Duodenitis ftir die Entstehung des Magenrund Duodenalgeschwr. Med. Klin. (D.) 23, 986 u. 1025, 1063, 1927.

Kronlein: Ueber die chirurgische Behandlung des Magengeschwurs. Arch. f. klin. Chir. 1906, Bd. 79.

Kosanović B.: O perforacijama stomačne i duoden. grizlice. S.A. 2, 49, 1923.

Kosanovič B.: Prikaz perforirane grizlice duodenuma. S.A. 3, 1928.

Kostić M.: G.e. ili resekcija u lečenju ulkusa. S.A. 9, 1926, 3, 1927.

Kostić S.: Dijagnostički značaj pneumo-peritoneuma kod perforacije gastro­duodenalnog ulkusa. S.A. 5, 1938.

Kretić M.: Osvrt na dio rada prof. H. v. Haberers. Med. Arh. 1, 1951.

Verrat M., Brette E. et Richard M.: Les ulcčres gastroduodeneaua d’etiologie au pathogenie connue chez homme. Arh. Mal. App. Digestiff 42, 532—562. avril 1953.

Lbhr: Klin. u. exper. Beitr. zur Frage der Perforationsperitonitis des Magenu. Duodenalgeschwtirs und seiner Folgezustande. Deutsche Zeitschr. f. Chir. 1924, Bd. 156.

Lohr: Bakteriolog, zur Magenchirurgie. Zentrl. f. Chir. Nr. 26, 1926.

Lewin D. C. a. Tenolove S.: Haematemesis with special reference to chronic peptic ulcer. B. M. Joum. 4600, 1949.

Loygue J.: Araitement des Hemorragies des ulceres gastro-duodenaua Presse Medicale 460, 22, 1951.

Mihal, Morison (Boston): Acute Perforated Peptic Ulcer. Criteria for Operation and Analysis of 500 cases. New. EngL J. Med. 1952.

Mahdl (Linz): Das Perforationsgefahrđete Geschwur des Magens und Zwolffingerdarmes. Wien. med. Wschr. 102/6, 1952.

Markoff N.: Klinik u. Therapie der massiven Magen-darmblutung. Bern. 1950.

Masten E. G., Bunts R. C.: Neurogenic erosions and perforations of the Stomach and oesophagus in Cerebral lesions: Raport of six cases. Arch. Int. Med. XII, 1934.

Meulengracht: Behandlung von Haematemesis und Malaena. K. Wschr. 1934.

Milin R.: Udeo endokrinog i neurovegetativnog sistema u patogenezi gastroduodenalnih grizlica i endokrina reakcija za njihovu dijagnozu. S. A. 3, 205—19.

Mandl: Ueber die abdominelle Vagusreselction beim Ulkusleiden. Wien. klin. Wschr. 13, 1948.

Mattisson K.: Ulkus ventrikuli traumatikum. Hygiena 1923.

Meyringk: Ueber Bakterienbefunde im Magen bei Ca. u. Ulkus. Verh. d. Deutsch. Ges. f. Hhir. 1924.

Mikulicz: Ueber Laparotomie bei Magen- u. Darmperforat. Vollmanhs Samrnl. klin. Vortr. Nr. 262, 1885.

Moynihan: Perforated peptic ulcer. Prakticioner. 1928.

Mondor-Lauret: Les ulceras perfores de l’estomac et du duodenum Masson 1924.

Nissen R.: Die chirurgische Behandlung des chronischen Magen- und Duodenalgeschwiirs. Dtsch. med. Waschr. 77, 1277, 1952.

Nissen R.: Die Operationswahl in der chirurgischen Behandlung des Magen und Duodenalgeschwiirs. Ciba-Symposium. Bd. 1, H. 3, 1953.

Naegeli O.: Differentialdiagnose in der inneren Medizin. 1937.

Ognev B. V.: Kirurgija br. 4, 1946.

Putnik M.: Lečenje perforisane grizlice na stomaku i dvanaeslopalačnom crevu, S.A. 4, 1947.

Protić M.: Med. Arhiv, 4, 1951.

Payr: Erfahrungen tiber Excision u. Resection b. Magengeschw. Verh. d. Deutsch. Ges. f. Chir. 2, 1909.

Radojević S.: Du meilleur traitement chirurgical des ulceres gastro-duoden. perfores. Revue de Chirurgie, 11, 1925.

Rokitansky C.: Handbuch d. pathol. Anatomie. 1955.

Stefanenko: Kirurgija 11, 1946.

Stierlin E.: Ueber die Mageninnervation in ihrer Beziehung zur Aetiologie und Therapie des Ulcus. Deutsch. Z. Chir. 152, 358, 1920.

Simić S., Bukurov S.: Naša zapažanja kod vagotomija. S. A., 5—6, 1949.

Schonbauer L.: Klinische Beitrage zur Perforationsperitonitis. Acta. chir. scand. 1924.

Strauss H.: Ueber hereditares und familiares Vorkommen von Ulcus ventr. und duoden. Minchn. med. Wschr., 9. 1921.

Smets-Henrotin: Akutne perforacije gastro-duodenalnih i peptičnih ulcera. La presse medical. 67, 1948.

Saegesser F.: Resultats du traitement chirurgical de la perforation aigue des ulceres de l’estomac. et duodenum. Helvetica Chirurgica Acta.. Vol. 20, Basel, 1953.

Tardieu G. et Tardieu C.: Le systeme nerveux vegetatif. 134, 467—9, 617—19, 1948.

Wallensten (Stockholm): Prymary Results in Palliative Surg. Treatment of Perforated Gastroduodenal. ulcers. Acta chir. scand. 1952, 104/1.

Published

16.01.1956

Issue

Section

Works

How to Cite

On Present tou Surgery of Stomach and Duodenum with Special Reference to Therapy in Acute Complications of Ulcerous Diseases. (1956). Acta Medica Academica, 2, 41-66. https://doi.org/10.5644/Radovi.14

Most read articles by the same author(s)