Forms and Frequency of Sanctions against General Practitioners and Family Medicine Specialists in Macedonia

Authors

  • Marija Zafirovska Association of General Practitioners and Physicians of Family Medicine of Southeast Europe (AGP/FM SEE) ; Center of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje
  • Aleksandar Zafirovski Association of General Practitioners and Physicians of Family Medicine of Southeast Europe (AGP/FM SEE) ; Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana
  • Ljubin Šukriev Association of General Practitioners and Physicians of Family Medicine of Southeast Europe (AGP/FM SEE) ; Center of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje
  • Danica Rotar-Pavlič Association of General Practitioners and Physicians of Family Medicine of Southeast Europe (AGP/FM SEE) ; Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana
  • Katarina Stavrikj Center of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-124.349

Keywords:

Sanctions, Primary Healthcare, Family Medicine, Financial Control, General Practitioners

Abstract

Objective. The goal of this study is to evaluate the reasons for sanctioning and the types of sanctions used on general medicine primary healthcare practitioners (GM-PHPs) in the Republic of Macedonia.

Materials and Method. This is a cross-sectional study for which we used an anonymous survey. This survey was distributed in a printed and electronic form to GM-PHPs in different parts of Macedonia and 438 of them responded. We used the SPSS statistical program to process the quantitative data. Results. The GM-PHPs’ sex was not associated with the sanctioning in the univariable analysis, but it was in the multivariable. GM-PHPs with ≥30 years of experience have 8.7 times higher odds to be sanctioned than those with ≤5 years of experience. GM-PHPs that worked in the hospital or ≤19 km from the nearest hospital were significantly more frequently sanctioned. The most common three reasons for sanctioning were: “Financial consumption of prescriptions and referrals above the agreed amount”, “Higher rate of sick leaves and/or unjustified sick leaves” and “Unrealized preventative goals or education”. “Financial sanction by scale” was the most common type of sanction - 49.8% of participants. GM-PHPs who followed the guidelines, but were exposed to violence by patients or their family/companion were sanctioned significantly more frequently.

Conclusions. In our sample, we can observe that in the univariable analysis age, years of experience, family medicine speciality, the distance of the workplace from the nearest hospital and violence are associated with sanctioning. In the multivariable analysis: sex, years of experience, the distance of the workplace from the nearest hospital and violence are associated with sanctioning. The majority of sanctions were financial sanctions (84.5%).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-21

How to Cite

Zafirovska, M., Zafirovski, A., Šukriev, L., Rotar-Pavlič, D., & Stavrikj, K. (2021). Forms and Frequency of Sanctions against General Practitioners and Family Medicine Specialists in Macedonia. Acta Medica Academica, 50(2), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.5644/ama2006-124.349

Issue

Section

Primary Health Care

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.